AramJonghu
AramJonghu deleted branch clang-tidy-fixes from zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 22:40:57 +02:00
AramJonghu deleted branch clang-tidy-hotfix from zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 22:40:52 +02:00
AramJonghu pushed to tidy-warning-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 22:40:35 +02:00
644a1e0c78 workflow update; node and docker deps added
AramJonghu created branch tidy-warning-fixes in zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 22:40:35 +02:00
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 22:36:58 +02:00
d9b555ec17 workflow update; node and docker deps added
AramJonghu commented on pull request zach/z-bar-qt#130 2026-06-29 20:31:17 +02:00
update to clang-tidy + workflow improvement cpp build & lint check

Consider a squash commit since there is a lot of noise with all the commits. A single squash commit would reduce the many commit messages with a single more informative commit message.

AramJonghu commented on pull request zach/z-bar-qt#130 2026-06-29 20:19:48 +02:00
update to clang-tidy + workflow improvement cpp build & lint check

I think for consistency and readibility of PRs reasons, I should reserve fixing clang-tidy (and format) for a different PR. That would muddy this PR and add noise.

On further search; we cannot…

AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 19:56:36 +02:00
50e179e0fe adusted workflow to fit new cmakelists
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 19:49:03 +02:00
25c9979674 Merge branch 'main' into clang-tidy-fixes
7d65578a5f proper VERSION var
f883b3d7fe versioning
Compare 3 commits »
AramJonghu commented on pull request zach/z-bar-qt#130 2026-06-29 11:36:20 +02:00
update to clang-tidy + workflow improvement cpp build & lint check

Certainly possible. Previous implementation was just a wildcard (so all diagnostics were considered errors). We can pick which diagnostics we want as errors, warnings, or info/help.

AramJonghu commented on pull request zach/z-bar-qt#130 2026-06-29 01:39:34 +02:00
update to clang-tidy + workflow improvement cpp build & lint check

@zach Many of the tidy rules are removed and they are not considered errors anymore. I will research further some other day (perhaps when skimming the current tidy warnings in the workflow step)…

AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:30:39 +02:00
49010e2a43 clang-tidy: disable 3 noisy bugprone checks
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:25:33 +02:00
a3ca37b51a clang-tidy: drop noisy checks, keep high-value only
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:19:42 +02:00
afd08e8aa7 revert; clang-tidy does on same workflow, but nonblocking
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:15:05 +02:00
7448fc101d slight revert into single workflow for missing tidy check reason
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:07:14 +02:00
2e2747ac04 in warnings will show job failed
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 01:03:16 +02:00
55b73eea19 separate workflows; build and lint clangtidy
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 00:59:25 +02:00
94100b6e2f resolve clang-tidy step workflow
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 00:49:28 +02:00
60b0844b7f undo of cmakelist changes, using AUR instead to resolve cava build requirement
AramJonghu pushed to clang-tidy-fixes at zach/z-bar-qt 2026-06-29 00:45:51 +02:00
1ac8162c30 adjusted CMake file to not require Cava